If both satisfy your performance needs, use the one you feel more comfortable developing with. Set your goal in terms of performance, install both products on your test machine and run them. These systems are distinguished by two key-characteristics: a) system scalability: the underlying database system must be able to manage and store a huge amount of spatial data and to allow applications to efficiently retrieve it and, b) interactive performance: very fast response times to client requests. While they are both fantastic, you still have to determine which is best for your specific needs. However, the PostgreSQL results were impressive. Just about everyone who has worked with databases has heard at least one of these names. There are basic statistics in pgclass and much more in pgstatistic (or the human-readable view pgstats based on it). MySQL and MariaDB performed similarly, with a negligible difference. I doubt you can go wrong by choosing either of the two databases, just beware of false benchmarks claiming one product is faster than another. 5 min read PostgreSQL and MySQL are both well-known powerhouse database management systems (DBMS). Real question is, what does it mean that something is "bad" at GIS "stuff"? What does bad mean? Can't calculate something? Can't store something? I just don't get what you consider bad really. Natively, MySQL supports 9 engines if I'm not mistaken but it has a plethora of commercial engines to choose from, along with 2 popular forks (Percona's and MariaDB) that introduce various enhancements, especially for InnoDB storage engine. Two popular choices are MS SQL Server and PostgreSQL. ![]() ![]() PostgreSQL: Which Should You Choose for a New Project Martyna Sawiska sql learn sql PostgreSQL Choosing the DBMS you will use for a new project is a very important and difficult decision. The recent versions of MySQL and Postgres have slightly erased the performance difference between the two databases. 26th Feb 2021 16 minutes read MS SQL Server vs. The difference is that MySQL has pluggable engine architecture, allowing it to plug in various engines. Previously, Postgres performance was more balanced, i.e., reads were generally slower than MySQL, but then it improved and can now write large amounts of data more efficiently, making concurrency handling better. In my opinion, it's silly to compare MySQL and PostgreSQL in terms of speed if there are variables unknown, such as - what's your budget, what's your target system output and what's your load rate?īoth RDBMSs are great, and they can be scaled. Performance difference between MySQL and PostgreSQL for the same schema/queries - Database Administrators Stack Exchange Performance difference between MySQL and PostgreSQL for the same schema/queries closed Ask Question Asked 10 years ago Modified 9 years, 8 months ago Viewed 47k times 20 Closed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |